Did Black Power Groups Harm The Struggle For Civil Rights?

Did ghastly top executive groups distress the struggle for cultivated rights? After the civic Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Act of 1965 it looked as though those who advocated peaceful protests had got what they wanted. The government passed laws which theoretic on the wholey gave dusky slew an equal standing(a) with white mass. However, in reality disparity was still rife in umteen parts of America and the majority of shady peck lived in poverty, a wicked condition to break out of.It discount be said that glum military group groups actually helped Martin Luther Kings inactive resistance policy as state didnt want to support force-out and Kings less contentious methods were then competent to appeal to a wider group. However, Black mightiness groups can in any case be blamed for harming the struggle for civil rights. Two contrasting groups were both engagement against the ill treatment of coloured tidy sum and Americans were made to choose who to support. With Black office groups use such violent methods umteen turned to Martin Luther King and began to support him. Having groups development physical force and demanding unrealistic changes of a sudden made Kings methods seem much more attractive and his aims out-of-the-way(prenominal) more reasonable. Nonetheless, Kings evasive action were proving slow to procure any forceful changes and particularly in the North, Midwest and West, black Americans had gained little from Kings urbane Right Movement.Groups turning to emphasis to admit results sent a message to the Americans that something should be done about the economic and cordial deprivation that black battalion faced. Black federal agency groups brought a sense of primp in being black and in the beginning during fundraising Black Power was able to acquire an impact in many another(prenominal) different areas of America, they helped in the ghettos which had not snarl Kings influence and fork out help for woeful s chool children.However, see black people using violence only cemented some Americans views of black people being inferior to whites. They saw the barbarian force being applied by Black Power groups as representative for every black person and on that pointfore were reluctant to take in any rights to black people. The use of violence may shake off even brought back Kings own movement, in white peoples eyes he was sully by association, they placed black people all in the same class.The ghetto riots between 1964-1968 hindered the civil rights movement, black people fought among themselves and there were hundreds at fatalities and thousands of arrests and injuries, the government was loath to give rights to the people who had caused such devastation in America. The relative unity that King had created within the Civil Rights Movement during the Freedom Rides was stop by the formation of Black Power groups, this hampered the movement as previously all the groups had been workin g together toward a mutual goal.Black Power groups did not really have defined aims, leaders such as Carmichael were constantly changing their ideas leaving people unsure as to what Black Power groups were actually protesting against. In conclusion, Martin Luther Kings policy of passive resistance and using love as a mechanism were not producing the results that black people wanted, poor people especially found it unuttered to relate to King as he was well-off, those living in ghettos responded more to the philosophy of Black Power.The moral high drop anchor that King had worked so hard to admit was shattered by Black Power and their idea that white people were inferior. Black Power groups enabled people to realise that something had to be done about the level of disadvantage that black people faced and although their methods were perplexing it cannot be denied that they produced results.